Author: Shrayasi Shukla

Illegal cricket streaming websites to be blocked : HC orders

Delhi High Court orders that there are 8 rogue websites that illegally streams the Indian Premier League crickets matches to be held in 2022 In the case of Star India Pvt. Ltd. And Anr. V. Live.Flixhub.net and ors. , plaintiff filed the suit for permanent injunction for restraining the broadcasting rights. The plaintiff asked injunction against the various rogue websites. Evidence provided by the plaintiff Footage screenshot of previous cricket matches including West India tour of India 2022 and Sri Lanka Tour of India 2022 which were aired without any kind of authorization by the rogue websites.   Rights of the…

Read More
Karnataka HC upheld the GO order : Hijab case

In Hijab case (Resham v. State of Karnataka), today the Karnataka High Court upheld the order which was given by the Karnataka High Court which was restricting the entry of the Muslim girls wearing Hijab in the educational institutions in the state of Karnataka. Judgement’s portion “Our answers to the question are, wearing of the Hijab by Muslim women does not form essential religious practice in Islamic faith.   Our second answer is prescription of school uniform is only a reasonable restriction,  constitutionally permissible which students cannot object to. In view of the above, government has the power to issue the GO…

Read More

In the case of RANA SANDEEP BUSSA AND ANR v. UOI AND ANR, the petition has been filed in the Supreme Court of India where the petitioner speaks from the side of the Ukraine return medical students and is seeking certain guidelines from the Supreme Court in regard to the continuation of the medical student who came back to India from Ukraine and are removed from the medical universities in the Ukraine.  Petition States “It has to be taken into consideration that National Medical Commission has allowed Foreign Medical Graduates to complete their internship India due to the on-going war…

Read More
Directions against OLX Quashed by Supreme Court  

Certain directions were given to the OLX by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in context of the screening mechanism of the advertisements that are to be posted on that platform. In exchange, the OLX filed a petition. As a result, OLX filed an appeal with the Supreme Court, which overturned the High Court’s decision. Justice UU Lalit, Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, and Justice PS Narasimha make up the Supreme Court bench. Direction given by the High Court Directions which the High Court gave in its interim order are as follows:  At least 02 ID proof of the person, who…

Read More
BJP’s Victory In Goa: Goa All Set To Welcome Parmod Sawant 

BJP’S great victory in the Goa election as it becomes the single largest party with the 20 seats. It seems like the people of Goa eagerly wanted to see Parmod Sawant as their Chief Minister. Parmod Sawant won the seat from the Sanquelim. In 2017 Mr. Parmod Sawant won by the votes which had the margin over 2000 but in 2022 this margin was reduced to 1000. Parmod Sawant defeated the candidate who was standing from the congress party named Dharmesh Saglani by the margin of over 650 votes. Senior Party leader of the BJP said, “The BJP will meet…

Read More
Recent Supreme Court judgement on common intention

The present criminal appeal case (STATE OF MP v. RAMJI LAL SHARMA) was filed against the High Court’s decision. Supreme Court restored the order of the Trial Court and held the all the accused liable for the murder under section 302 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.  COMMON INTENTION (SECTION 34):  Common Intention has been defined under section 34 of the Indian Penal Code which tells that any act of criminal nature done by several people with the common intention then each of the people will be liable for that particular act in the same manner as…

Read More
Recent Supreme Court case related to section 34

The present case (STATE OF MP Vs. RAMJI SHARMA) of the criminal appeal, the appeal was filed against the High Court. Supreme Court restored the order of the Trial Court. Hence, the accused were held liable for the murder under section 302 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In its recent judgement Supreme Court observed that when there is a case of common intention and the common intention of all accused is proved that in such case two things will be immaterial and they are: Whether any of the accused who shared the common intention used any…

Read More