Downey Jr's 2009 movie and Cumberbatch's 2010 Sherlock Holmes series, both adapted from Doyle's books, showcased charismatic qualities and modern twists. Both became cult classics, with Cumberbatch's portrayal of Sherlock Holmes being particularly noteworthy.
01
Downey Jr. excels in physical combat, distinguishing him from Cumberbatch's Sherlocks.
02
BBC Sherlock successfully adapted Sherlock Holmes from Victorian setting to modern, enhancing relatability and realism in the series.
03
Sherlock's physical description accurately reflects Cumberbatch's height, limbs, and fingers.
04
BBC Sherlock's success relied on the chemistry between Cumberbatch's Sherlock and Freeman's John Watson, emphasizing their crucial roles in the series.
05
BBC Sherlock's quirky character excels due to longer TV series format, allowing for more complex, stronger character development.
06
Sherlock Holmes' antisocial behavior is likable, with Cumberbatch's character charming and desirable, while Downey Jr's character is criticized for being a Victorian version of Tony Stark.
07
Downey Jr's charismatic portrayal in Sherlock Holmes made socially inept scenes difficult to believe, while BBC Sherlock's abrasive and clueless portrayal felt more organic.
08
Cumberbatch's Sherlock portrays an organic rivalry between Sherlock and Andrew Scott, highlighting the protagonist's desire to protect loved ones.
09
Though both Downey Jr and Cumberbatch's Sherlocks shared something of a romantic connection with their respective Irenes, RDJ's was the only one to share overt feelings
Keeping in mind all these points, we can safely concede that Benedict Cumberbatch's Sherlock Holmes series did a better job than Robert Downey's Sherlock movies.