Author: Nidhi Yadav

The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently delivered a verdict denying relief to former Chief Minister Digvijay Singh in a defamation complaint filed against him. The complaint was filed in response to Singh’s alleged remark that the workers of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) are the detectives of Pakistan. Background of the Case A private complaint was filed by Awdhesh Singh, an advocate and worker of the RSS and BJP, under Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) before the Judicial Magistrate First Class in Gwalior. The complaint alleged that Digvijay Singh, on…

The recent decision by the Himachal Pradesh High Court to uphold the guidelines issued by the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) regarding the selection of auditors for Cooperative Banks has brought clarity and assurance to the banking sector. In a writ petition filed by Chartered Accountants registered with the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, the court dismissed the challenge against NABARD’s guidelines, emphasizing the relevance and rationality of the conditions imposed. This article explores the significance of the court’s decision and the implications it holds for the Cooperative Banks and their stakeholders. Validating the Guidelines The…

The use of AI (Artificial Intelligence) cameras for detecting road violations has become a subject of debate due to corruption allegations surrounding the implementation of the project. However, the Kerala High Court has recently expressed its support for this innovative venture, emphasizing that corruption claims should be addressed separately. This article examines the court’s stance on the matter and highlights the importance of not discouraging the use of AI cameras for enforcing road safety. The Court’s Appreciation of the Innovative System  Justice P V Kunhikrishnan, presiding over a single bench, commended the introduction of AI surveillance cameras on roads in…

MP High Court recently gained attention by dismissing a rape case against a defendant in a notable ruling. The court’s decision was influenced by various factors, such as the delayed filing of the First Information Report (FIR) and the enduring relationship between the accused person and the prosecutrix. Justice Vishal Dhagat, presiding over the case, observed that the earlier FIR filed by the prosecutrix against other men indicated the presence of “some ulterior motives.” This decision has sparked a debate and raised questions about the complexities involved in determining the veracity of rape allegations. Background The case before the court…

In a recent development, the Delhi High Court made the decision to reject an urgent hearing for a public interest litigation (PIL) petition requesting a ban on the movie Adipurush. Adipurush, which was released in theaters last week, has been facing criticism for its dialogues and depiction of certain characters. The case was brought before the vacation bench of Justices Tara Vitasta Ganju and Amit Mahajan. The Plea and Allegations: The counsel representing the petitioner-organization, Hindu Sena, informed the bench that the movie contains several controversial scenes that are allegedly affecting India’s relations with other countries. They pointed out that…

Introduction  The Gujarat High Court recently received a response from the state government regarding a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking a ban on the use of loudspeakers in mosques. The government, through Additional Secretary Nikhil Bhatt, expressed its commitment to regulating the use of loudspeakers and ensuring compliance with Noise Pollution Rules. It emphasized the need to strike a balance between the interests of residents and the parties using loudspeakers for various purposes, such as weddings, events, and religious celebrations. Regulating Loudspeaker Usage The state government acknowledged the adverse effects of unauthorized and unregulated loudspeaker usage on society and the…

The Supreme Court, today, refused to entertain the Union government’s appeal against the Delhi High Court’s order that halted the suspension of registration for specific private Haj Group Organisers (HGOs). The court opined that the issue was already being addressed by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court and that the pilgrims should be allowed to undertake their Haj pilgrimage without the burden of ongoing litigation. Background and Delhi High Court Order: The Delhi High Court received multiple pleas from private Haj Group Organisers challenging the suspension of their registration certificates and quota for Haj 2024, as announced by…