In the commissioner area, with the flag march enforced by Section 144, the subsequent hearing within the Gyanvapi Shringar Gauri case is scheduled to be preserved on September 12, but the police commissioner and administration have cancelled it. section 144 within the Varanasi commissionerate area.
The court of Varanasi District Judge Dr. Ajay Krishna will give its verdict on this sensitive matter on September 12, i.e. tomorrow, the administration has become alert about this and together with monitoring the social media continuously, the police religious gurus and advisors of the elite people. is on turned.
Religion amid security
Similarly, in accordance with Police Commissioner A. Satish Ganesh, preparations for the challenges of law and order in Commissionerate Varanasi have been reviewed, and cops have been instructed to determine communication with all religious leaders and important persons in their respective areas. An Order under Section 144 CrPC is issued.
The Police Commissioner says that we’ve implemented the sector scheme further as we’ve ordered flag march and food patrolling under area domination in sensitive areas and have been instructed to put PRVS and QRTs for sensitive points apart from on the Inter-District Board. Instructions have also been given to increase checking and alertness. There is also a facility for checking all the station in-charges and hotel Dharamshala guest houses in their respective areas, as well as monitoring being done on social media. Admission Police and Commissioner Santosh Singh within the meeting have also ordered the policemen.
What is the entire controversy?
In the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri dispute case, the court had reserved the decision till September 12. The hearing of both parties has been completed. Quite a dozen cases are pending in several courts regarding Kashi Vishwanath Temple and Gyanvapi Masjid.
In this case, the then Civil Judge Ravi Kumar Diwakar issued the order for the survey. After this, a survey of the premises of Gyanvapi Masjid was conducted. After this survey, the Shivling was claimed to be within the mosque’s vazukhana. On the other hand, the Muslim side called it a fountain. The controversy, in this case, increased so much that the Anjuman Intejamia Committee visited the Supreme Court against the survey.
