The consolidation by Hindus’ that would cherish the mood of UP Elections

The social context difference can be seen as one move from Muzaffarnagar to Bareilly District; this context is polarizing the religion in Uttar Pradesh, creating unity among the people. The consolidation by Hindus’ that would cherish the mood of UP Elections.

In a rally held in Akbarpur, Narendra Modi showed apparent confidence towards the fragmentation of the “Hindu Vote.”

This topic showed us a reference when PM Modi considered Trinamool Congress (TMC).

“Aap Khule aam, Hindu vote ko baatna chahte hain, toh aap kiske vote ikkhata karna chahte hai.” As phase 2 is about to get over, BJP is taking a move ahead and beaming towards the political parties and their leaders who passed a specific statement against BJP, Modi, and Yogi Adityanath.

Talking about the surface level, there are some significant reasons to shift from BJP to Samajwadi Party to have some affirmative cause to do the same.

The two of the parties are the strongest parties in the state of Uttar Pradesh.

The Samajwadi Party have their own set of ideologies wherein they tend to promote harmony among the people.

On the contrary, the ideologies followed by BJP are a bit different; they are more Hindu-oriented and try to keep pace among the people for the same reason.

Samajwadi-BJP coalition? 

Back in 2017, the social tension between BJP and Samajwadi Party was adjusted successfully, but it seemed to return this time with a higher level of fore again.

The formulation of the Uttar Pradesh elections was already heated from the start; this added to the limits over the statements constantly passed on by various political leaders against the opposition party.

Nevertheless, what if there needs to be a coalition between the two strongest parties in Uttar Pradesh?

The seat count in the state is divided unequally, so there might be an option to ally with BJP and the Samajwadi Party.

However, according to the reports, in the recent rally conducted by PM Narendra Modi, it was understood that BJP would not come to consolidate the government with Samajwadi Party.

It was very much clear from the gestures and body language of the PMO that BJP doesn’t want any sort of coalition with the Samajwadi Party.

Adding to it, when talking with the locals of Akbarpur, they conveyed that,

“We have full confidence in our PM and BJP and have a bust of a surety that they would come to power again.” 

Tracking of the Past results

2017 was when BJP’s popularity was at its peak because of Narendra Modi. During the 2017 Uttar Pradesh Elections, the strike rate of BJP was approximately 91% in the assembly constituency (ACS) that went up to the poll during the election at Uttar Pradesh.

In Phase 2 of the 2017 UP elections, the strike rate of BJP came down to 68.98%.

This indicated that BJP had made a mixture of votes in the state; significant votes were consolidated from the Hindus.

The polarization occurred during the UP election, but BJP instead marketed and PR the growing popularity of PMO Narendra Modi.  

 Centralization created by Modi 

So, in the past five years, the growth of BJP has been happening very rapidly, and often, it is unstoppable; in almost every northern state, BJP is boisterous, the competition they have usually does not have that ground hold over the state.

But, in Uttar Pradesh, the scenario is different, especially this time. Samajwadi Party is one of their best rivals in the state.

Their ground hold over the state is better than the Bharatiya Janata Party. Still, Narendra Modi has successfully centralized the state with the monosomy of BJP.

With Yogi Adityanath promoting the state and its culture, with time, BJP has gripped the state well with its campaigns and ideas.

This procedure generates a fundamental political drama, a few political leaders like this methodology.

Still, people are okay and enjoying the state’s rated leaders, so the political influence is getting hyped up in the form.  

In the closure, the statement issued by a BJP official (Identity hidden) says that

“the lower-level decisiveness does not matter, what matters is the decision making of the higher authority, if the higher level wants, then the problem will solve.”

---

Published By: Jaspreet Singh

Edited By: Kritika Kashyap