Overview
NASA again mustย stop the work on its human moon lander partnership withย SpaceXย due to a lawsuit from Jeff Bezos;ย Blue Origin, which further risks the agency’s tight timeline to get back astronauts to the moon.
In mid-April, NASA announced that SpaceX would beย building the Human Lander Systemย (HLS), which will ferryย astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface, for the Artemis 3 mission due to fly in 2024.
But as the decision, NASA has spent just weeks working on the partnership due to theย repeated objections from Blue Origin, which also competed for the contract.
After an independent government agency rejected Blue Origin’s first complaint about the contract, the company sued NASA in the Court of Federal Claims, which exclusively hears cases against the U.S. government, on Aug. 13; the agency has now agreed to pause the project for 2.5 months in exchange for resolving the lawsuit by the end of that window.
NASA’s Artemis program to return astronauts to the moon is built on partnerships with American businesses as the agency continues the model it established with its commercial cargo and the crew programs which are affiliated with the International Space Station.
While astronauts will launch on the agency’s own Space Launch System (SLS) mega rocket and Orion spacecraft, NASA wanted to use a commercial partner to ferry them to the lunar surface.
The Law Suit
Three groups submitted proposals to fill that role: SpaceX,ย Dyneticsย and a so-called National Team led by Blue Origin.
Many expected NASA would select two, as it did for the space station contracts; meanwhile, Congress allotted significantly less money for the program than NASA had requested, $850 million compared to more than $3 billion.
Soย NASA only awarded one contract, and only to SpaceX, which had made the smallest bid and planned to adapt its already-in-the-works Starship vehicle and Super Heavy booster for the job.
Blue Origin andย Dyneticsย promptly requested the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to review NASA’s decision, forcing a pause on the project; that office on July 30 announced that it wouldย let the selection stand.
Later after two weeks,ย Blue Origin brought the issueย to the Court of Federal Claims.
The suit marks one more delay in a process that NASA presumably hoped would unfold smoothly.
The Artemisย schedule of the agency was always ambitious; less than a year after its announcement, COVID-19 swept the globe, forcing the government and companies alike to halt on-site work.
Other vital pieces of the program have also faced delays: NASA’s SLS rocket’s crucial green-run test series ran slow, and the final instalment required two attempts.
Meanwhile, NASA’s Office of Inspector General released a report arguing that NASA’s lunarย spacesuits could not be readyย before April 2025.
Political Aspect
President Donald Trump’s administration established the 2024 deadline, and when President Joe Biden took office, many wondered whether a new administration would cause a delay in the program.
But throughout the presidential transition and the confirmation of Biden’s selection for NASA administrator, former Florida senator Bill Nelson, the agency has continued to say that it would attempt to meet the ambitious date, provided Congress funded the program sufficiently.
“NASA is committed to Artemis and to maintaining the nation’s global leadership in space exploration,” agency officials wrote in the statement.
“With our partners, we will go to the moon and stay to enable science investigations, develop new technology, and create high-paying jobs for the greater good and in preparation to send astronauts to Mars.”












