The vehement urge for support from both countries involved in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war doesn’t seem to get away from its proclivities. The diplomatic situation at the world level is complex, with different countries taking different positions in the conflict.
The US and NATO’s preparations to assist Ukraine in getting ready for an operation against Russia in the spring were described in secret documents that were extensively disseminated on social media, according to a prominent newspaper, as the Pentagon said that it is investigating the security lapse.
Russia has accused the United States and NATO of provoking the conflict and has called for a peaceful resolution. Ukraine has accused Russia of aggression and has called for international support. Any peace discussions with Ukraine must focus on the “new world order,” says the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Sergey Lavrov.
This week, the Kremlin declared that there was no diplomatic solution and that it would have to continue its more than year-long attack in Ukraine.
Fears of a worldwide food catastrophe were on the rise at the start of the war since Russia and Ukraine are significant exporters of grains and other agricultural goods. However, Lavrov warned that Russia may quit the historic agreement that opened up Black Sea ports to crucial exports.
The deal that has permitted the shipment of more than 25 million tonnes of grain has been threatened with termination by Russia on several occasions. Moscow has been claiming that their agreement, which guaranteed the freedom to export fertilizer devoid of Western restrictions, is not being honored.
In accordance with the initial agreement, which was reached by Ankara and the UN last July, Turkey is advocating for a 120-day extension.
Furthermore, Antony Blinken, the US Secretary of State, acknowledged that some of China’s proposed solutions for the Ukraine conflict are beneficial. However, he also stated that China is attempting to maintain a dual position by endorsing a cease-fire plan while also supporting Vladimir Putin.
Russia is seeking whatever opportunity it can to take the initiative back. to attempt to sway the possible outcomes for Ukraine’s counteroffensive scenarios. They sow doubt, undermine the concepts, and ultimately terrify us with their supposed knowledge.
Statement by Ukraine’s President
According to a key advisor to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Kyiv has shown a rare willingness to deal with Russia based on the results of its spring assault.
On the other hand, Ukraine rejected Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva’s recommendation that it give up Crimea to settle its conflict with Russia, which invaded the peninsula in 2014. Lula da Silva is the president of Brazil.
According to Mykhailo Podolyak, a very large amount of fictitious information was present in the stolen data that was disclosed on Thursday and Russia was attempting to regain the upper hand in its invasion.
The talks would take place if Ukrainian forces crossed Crimea’s “administrative border” and would center on the Crimean Peninsula, which Moscow unlawfully seized in 2014.
Moreover, according to reports, the US, Germany, and Hungary oppose the proposal that some other NATO countries expect to make at the meeting in July. There was an intense debate about what exactly should be provided to Ukraine at the conference in Lithuania, two officials with knowledge of the situation told the newspaper.
Read More: Ukraine enraged over Russia’s UNSC Presidency
